Asian Development Policy Review

Published by: Asian Economic and Social Society 
Online ISSN: 2313-8343
Print ISSN: 2518-2544
Total Citation: 10

No. 3

National Housing Policies and the Realisation of Improved Housing for All in Nigeria: An Alternative Approach

Pages: 47-60
Find References

Finding References

National Housing Policies and the Realisation of Improved Housing for All in Nigeria: An Alternative Approach

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search

Citation: 1

Kalu, Ijeoma E. , Agbarakwe, Henry Ugochukwu , Anowor, Oluchukwu F

Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS

  1. Ademiluyi, A.I. and B.A. Raji, 2008. Public and private developers as agents in urban housing delivery in Sub- Saharan Africa: The situation in Lagos State. Humanity & Social Sciences Journal, 3(2): 143-150.
  2. Agiobenebo, T.J., 2003. Public sector economics: Theories, issues and application. Lima Computers, Port Harcourt.
  3. Akeju, A.A., 2007. Challenges to providing affordable housing in Nigeria. Abuja: Shehu Yar'adua Center.
  4. Akinmoladun, O.I. and J. Oluwoye, 2007. An assessment of why the problems of housing shortages persist in developing countries: A case of study of Lagos metropolis, Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Social Science, 4(4): 589-598.
  5. Anyanwu, J.C., 1997. The structure of the Nigerian economy (1960 - 1997). Onitsha: Joanee Educational Publishers Ltd.
  6. Apparicio, P. and A. Seguin, 2006. Measuring the accessibility of services and facilities for residents of public housing in montreal. Urban Studies, 43(1): 187-211.
  7. Arimah, B.C., 2000. Housing sector performance in global perspective a cross-city investigation. Urban Studies, 37(3): 2553-2579.
  8. Burns Leland, S. and L. Grebler, 1976. Resource allocation to housing investment: A comparative international study. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 25(1): 271-282.
  9. Chatterjee, L., 1981. Housing development in Nigeria occasional paper series, Agency for International Development Office of Housing, Boston. Available from
  10. Chukwujekwu, I.E., 2006. Facilitating low cost housing scheme: Which way forward in housing today. Journal of the Association of Housing Corporation of  Nigeria (AHCN) ISSN ), 1(10): 0331-9598.
  11. Doling, J. and R. Ronald, 2010. Home ownership and asset-based welfare. J Hous and the Built Environ, 25(2): 165-173.
  12. Fernandez-Maldonado, A.M. and J. Bredenoord, 2010. Progressive housing approaches in the current peruvian policies. Habitat International, 32(1): 11- 18. DOI 10.1016/j.habitatint.2009.11.018.
  13. Filani, M.O., 1987. Accessibility and urban poverty in Nigeria: The urban poor in Nigeria. Ibadan: Evans Brothers (Nigeria) Publishers Ltd.
  14. Hanson, G., R. Lloyd and B. Lorimer, 2004. Evaluation of the social housing programme. Yukon: Yukon Housing Corporation.
  15. Ibem, E.O. and O.O. Amole, 2010. Evaluation of public housing programmes in Nigeria: A theoretical and conceptual approach. The Built & Human Environment Review, 1(3): 88 - 117.
  16. Jhingan, M.L., 2007. The economics of development and planning. 33rd Edn., Delhi: Vrinda Publications (P) Ltd.
  17. Keynes, J.M., 1936. The general theory of employment, interest, and money. New York: Harcourt Brace.
  18. Lall, S., 2002. An evaluation of a public sector Low-Income housing project in Alwar, India. Working Paper No. 6 at Society for Development Studies in New Delhi-India Prepared for the DFID. Available from,2009.
  19. Mabogunje, A., 2006. In housing today (2006). Taming the monster of housing affordability. Journal of the Association of Housing Corporation of Nigeria (AHCN) ISSN ) 0331-9598, 1(10).
  20. Magutu, J., 1997. An appraisal of chaani low-income housing programme in Kenya. Environment and Urbanization, 9(2): 307-320.
  21. Marcano, L. and I.J. Ruprah, 2008. Incapacity to pay or moral hazard? Public mortgage rates delinquency in Chile, OVE Working Papers No. 0308. Inter-American Development Bank, Office of Evaluation and Oversight (OVE).
  22. Mayo Stephen, K., 1981. Theory and estimation in the economics of housing demand. Journal of Urban Economics, 10(1): 95-116.
  23. McMaster, R. and C. Watkins, 1999. The economics of housing: The need for a new approach. Paper Presented at PRRES/AsRES/IRES Conference, 26-30 January 1999, Kuala Lumpur.
  24. Meen, G., 1998. 25 years of house price modelling in the UK. What have we learnt and where do we go from here? Paper Presented at the ENHR Conference, Cardiff.
  25. Mohit, M.A., M. Ibrahim and Y.R. Rashid, 2010. Assessment of residential satisfaction in newly designed public low-cost housing in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International, 34(2): 18-27.
  26. Mukhija, V., 2004. The contradictions in enabling private developer of affordable housing: A cautionary case from India. Urban Studies, 4(11): 2231-2244.
  27. Obashoro-John, O., 2002. Programme evaluation in Nigeria: Challenges and prospects. Lagos: Department of Adult Education University of Lagos.
  28. Obeng-Odoom, F., 2009. Has the habitat for humanity housing scheme achieved its goal? A Ghanaian case study. Journal Housing and the Built Environment, 24(1): 67-84.
  29. Ohale, L. and H.U. Agbarakwe, 2009. An introduction to economic planning. Port Harcourt: Emhai Books.
  30. Okowa, W.J., 2006. Urban bias in Nigerian development: A study of the matthew effect in national development. Port Harcourt: Pam Unique Publishing Company Limited.
  31. Okupe, O., 2002. Problem of real estate developers in Nigeria, A Paper Presented at a Workshop Organized by the Nigerian Institute of Quantity Surveyors, Abuja.
  32. Sengupta, U. and S. Sharma, 2008. No longer sukumbasis: Challenges in grassroots –led squatter resettlement programme in kathmandu with special reference to Kirtipur housing project. Habitat International, 33(1): 34-44.
  33. Sengupta, U. and A.G. Tipple, 2007. The performance of public –sector housing in Kolkata, India in the post–reform milieu. Urban Studies, 44(10): 2009-2027.
  34. Ubale, M.Y., D. Martin and S.T. Wee, 2013. Comparative study between Malaysia and Nigeria formal low cost housing policy issues. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 3(7): 923-947.
  35. Yeun, B., A. Yeh, J.A. Stephen, G. Earl, J. Ting and L.K. Kwee, 2006. High-rise living Singapore public housing. Urban Studies, 42(3): 583-600.
  36. Yinger, J., 2005. Housing and commuting: The theory of urban residential structure. An e-Book, Version, 1.0: April 2005.
No any video found for this article.
(2014). National Housing Policies and the Realisation of Improved Housing for All in Nigeria: An Alternative Approach. Asian Development Policy Review, 2(3): 47-60. DOI:
The seventh goal of the MDGs is to ensure environmental sustainability which includes as its targets: increasing access to new technologies to support sustainable development by making information about sustainable practices more widespread, and bringing new technologies to rural areas such that people will be able to have better access to information and employment without having to migrate to urban areas; these would without doubt help to system the flow of rural-urban migration and as well stem the growth of slums. Good quality housing as a basic need is lacking for a sizeable number of people around the globe but seem most severe in developing economies including Nigeria. Also few houses are available, especially in the urban centers, to the ever increasing number of workers in both formal and informal sectors. The debates on the direction of housing and welfare policy have often been guided by assumptions derived from a preponderance of Anglo-American cases and perspectives. The purpose of this study is to present an alternative approach to housing policies especially in Nigeria; and we have come to the inescapable conclusion that housing is a social responsibility which cannot be left to the free play of market forces. This study therefore recommends the need to strengthen institutions and overhaul systems and processes for a more virile housing sector such that a balance between the urban housing units and the rural housing units could be attained.

Contribution/ Originality
This study contributes in the existing literature and offers alternative view to the dominant approach to housing issues as it deviates significantly from the preponderance pro-market perspectives. It proffers a holistic approach to contain housing challenges.