International Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research

Published by: PAK Publishing Group
Online ISSN: 2312-6515
Print ISSN: 2313-0423
Total Citation: 4

No. 1

How the Principles of the Sharing Economy Can Improve Organizational Performance of the US Public School System

Pages: 1-11
Find References

Finding References


How the Principles of the Sharing Economy Can Improve Organizational Performance of the US Public School System

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search
Cite

DOI: 10.18488/journal.74.2017.41.1.11

Stephen K Callaway

Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS

  1. Biddle, B. and D. Berliner, 2002. A research synthesis / unequal school funding in the United States. Beyond Instructional Leadership, 59(8): 48-59.
  2. Buchanan, J., 1965. An economic theory of clubs. Economica, 32(125): 1-14. View at Google Scholar 
  3. Callaway, S. and D. Dobrzykowski, 2009. Service-oriented entrepreneurship: Service-dominant logic in green design and healthcare. Service Science, 1(4): 225-240. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  4. Chappell, B., 2013. U.S. students slide in global ranking on math, reading, science. National Public Radio. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2013/12/03/248329823/u-s-high-school-students-slide-in-math-reading-science [Accessed December 3, 2016].
  5. Chase, R., 2015. Peers Inc: How people and platforms are inventing the collaborative economy and reinventing capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.
  6. Common Core State Standards Initiative, 2016. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/ [Accessed November 18, 2016].
  7. Eisenhardt, K., 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57–74. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  8. Heitin, L., 2013. U.S. achievement stalls as other nations make gains. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2013/12/03/14pisa.h33.html [Accessed December 3, 2016].
  9. Johnson, R.B., A.J. Onwuegbuzie and L.A. Turner, 2007. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2): 112-133. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  10. Layton, L., 2015. Study says standardized testing is overwhelming nation’s public schools. The Washington Post, October 24, 2015. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/study-says-standardized-testing-is-overwhelming-nations-public-schools/2015/10/24/8a22092c-79ae-11e5-a958-d889faf561dc_story.html?utm_term=.94fae8b00ae4 [Accessed November 13, 2016].
  11. Noer, M., 2012. One man, one computer, 10 million students: How Khan academy is reinventing education, November 19, 2012. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelnoer/2012/11/02/one-man-one-computer-10-million-students-how-khan-academy-is-reinventing-education/#44e052d144e0 [Accessed November 22, 2016].
  12. OECD, 2014. Education at a glance 2014: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. Retrieved http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2014-en.
  13. Paul, M., 2014. Ensuring quality provision of education for all: Discovering challenges faced by teachers of students with learning disabilities in regular primary schools in Masvingo District. International Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research, 1(1): 26-37. View at Google Scholar 
  14. Samuelson, P., 1954. The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4): 387–389. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  15. Shane, S., 2009. Technology strategy for managers and entrepreneurs. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
  16. Sherman, A., 2015. Does the United States spend more per student than most countries?. Politifact Florida, April 21st, 2015. Retrieved from http://www.politifact.com/florida/statements/2015/apr/21/jeb-bush/does-united-states-spend-more-student-most-countri/.
  17. Strauss, V. and B. Turque, 2008. Fate of D.C. Voucher program darkens. The Washington Post. June 9, 2008. Washington, D.C: The Washington Post Company. pp: 1–2.
  18. U.S. Department of Education, 2000. National center for education statistics, the condition of education 2000, NCES 2000–062. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  19. U.S. Department of Education, 2015. Office of elementary and secondary education, office of state support, fundamental change: Innovation in America’s schools under race to the top, Washington, D.C., 2015. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/performance.html.
  20. U.S. Department of Education, 2016. National center for education statistics, the condition of education 2016, NCES 2016-144. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  21. Wong, A., 2016. A public-school paradox: Why do so many presidents send their kids to private school? The Atlantic, August 10, 2016. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/08/a-public-school-paradox/495227/ [Accessed November 13, 2016].
  22. Yoffie, D., D. Mehta and R. Seseri, 2006. Microsoft in 2005. Harvard business school case. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Publishing.
  23. Zinyama, T., 2014. Contracting out: What works, what doesn’t and why? International Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research, 1(2): 64-79. View at Google Scholar 
No any video found for this article.
(2017). How the Principles of the Sharing Economy Can Improve Organizational Performance of the US Public School System. International Journal of Public Policy and Administration Research, 4(1): 1-11. DOI: 10.18488/journal.74.2017.41.1.11
The US public school system is struggling with issues of student achievement. Therefore, the current study will examine education in the context of public goods, identifying three key dimensions of education as public goods and club goods. Then using agency theory, the paper addresses how school districts may be organized into local responsibility centers (RCs), to encourage local participation and better measure performance. The paper also identifies how the collaboration (sharing) economy may offer insight into all of these issues, examining four small case examples of organizations that illustrate the principles of the sharing economy. The paper then develops a proposal for revamping public education, based upon these principles.

Contribution/ Originality
The paper critically reviewed the literature on public goods and club goods, specifically focusing on its application to education. As such, this study contributes to the existing literature by presenting a new way of assessing public education, and therefore develops novel and insightful recommendations on educational reform.