Journal of Social Economics Research

Published by: Pak Publishing Group
Online ISSN: 2312-6264
Print ISSN: 2312-6329
Total Citation: 23

Recent Articles

Specifying Quality of Governance in Transition Economies with Cluster Analysis

Pages: 1-8
Find References

Finding References

Specifying Quality of Governance in Transition Economies with Cluster Analysis

Search :
Google Scholor
Search :
Microsoft Academic Search

DOI: 10.18488/journal.35.2017.41.1.8


Export to    BibTeX   |   EndNote   |   RIS

  1. Abed, G.T., 1998. Governance issues and transition economies. IMF, May 27-28, Challenges to Economies in Transition: Stabilization, Growth, and Governance” Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic May 27–28, 1998.
  2. Acemoğlu, D. and J.A. Robinson, 2012. Why nations fail: The origins of power. 1st Edn., London: Crown Publishers.
  3. Andrijauskas, K., 2013. Chinaʼs economic penetration into post-soviet central Asia and Eastern Europe. Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, 30: 113-131. Retrieved from
  4. Cihangir, D., 2011. AB Aday ve Potansiyel Aday Ülkelerinin 2011 İlerleme Raporları Hakkında Değerlendirme. İktisadi Kalkınma Vakfı. Retrieved from
  5. Eurasıan, 2016. Retrieved from
  6. Freedom House, 2014. Freedom house in the world 2014. Retrieved from
  7. Freedom House, 2015. Freedom house in the world 2015. Retrieved from
  8. Gainsborough, M., 2012. Elites vs. reform in Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam. Journal of Democracy, 23(2): 34-46. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  9. Hair, J.F., W.C. Black, B.J. Babin and R.E. Anderson, 2009. Multivariate data analysis. 7th Edn., London, UK: Prentice Hall.
  10. Johnson, C., 2002. Democratic transition in the Balkans: Romania's Hungarian and Bulgaria's Turkish minority (1989–99). Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 8(1): 1-28. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  11. Kooiman, J., 1993. Modern governance: New government-society interactions. London: Sage.
  12. Maldona, N., 2010. The world bank's evolving concept of good governance and its impact on human rights. Doctoral Workshop on Development and International Organizations, Stockholm, Sweden.
  13. Manly, B.F.J., 2005. Multivariate statistical methods: A primer. London: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  14. Mikheev, S., 2006. Post-soviet space: Elites are against integration. Postsovetskoje Prostranstvo: Elity Protiv Integracii.
  15. Mikhnovets, I., 2015. Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia: What has been done after the decisive Eastern partnership summit in vilnius in 2013. Austria Institut für Europa- Und Sıcherheitspolitik. Retrieved from
  16. Mukhamedzhanova, D., 2007. Economic preconditions of regional integration in the post-soviet space. Journal of Kazakhstan in the Global Processes, 4: 138-149. View at Google Scholar 
  17. North, D., 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. 2nd Edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Rodrik, D., 2007. One economics, many recipes: Globalization, institutions, and economic growth. 1st Edn., United Kingdom: Princeton University Press.
  19. Svenjnar, J., 2002. Transition economies: Performance and challenges. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(1): 3-28. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  20. Unlukaplan, I., 2011. Multivariate investigation of governance indicators in European Union. Journal of US-China Public Administration, 8(1): 66-76.
  21. Unlukaplan, I. and E. Canıkalp, 2015. Determination of Turkey's quality of governance position by world bank governance indicators: Cluster analysis. Marmara University Journal of Economic & Administrative Sciences, 37(2): 409-427.
  22. Ward, J.H.J., 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301): 236–244. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  23. World Bank, 1989. Sub Saharan Africa: From crisis to sustainable growth – a long term perspective study. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  24. World Bank, 1992. Governance and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  25. World Bank, 1994. Governance and world bank experiences. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  26. World Bank, 1997. The state in a changing world. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  27. World Bank, 2001. Issue note: E-government and the world bank. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  28. Yesdauletova, A. and A. Yesdauletov, 2014. The Eurasian Union: Dynamics and difficulties of the post-soviet integration. Trames, 18(1): 3-17. View at Google Scholar | View at Publisher
  29. Yuksel, M., 2000. Yönetişim Kavramı Üzerine. Ankara Barosu Dergisi, 58(3): 145-159. View at Google Scholar 
No any video found for this article.
(2017). Specifying Quality of Governance in Transition Economies with Cluster Analysis. Journal of Social Economics Research, 4(1): 1-8. DOI: 10.18488/journal.35.2017.41.1.8
With the collapse of Soviet Russia, transition of communist countries towards the market economy not only caused an economic transformation but also formal and informal constraints, institutional structures and legal norms in society were changed. IMF's and World Bank’s reports and governance concept containing neoliberal policies that took place in World Bank’s publications were important factors behind this transition. In this study, it is aimed to analyze quality of governance in transition economies by the year 2014. With this framework, Cluster analysis is performed by Ward (1963) Minimum Variance Method by using World Bank Governance and Freedom House dataset.

Contribution/ Originality
This paper contributes to the literature by determination of transition economies’ position in terms of their governance scores in a multivariate framework. The results of Cluster analysis indicate that countries in the process of integration with the EU have better governance scores with respect to other transition economies.